outliers Archives - Lazy Man and Money

I saw something the other day that reminded me of The Monkees. You might think it was the recent death of singer Davy Jones, but I had been extremely busy that weekend and it was something else entirely. I don’t remember what it was, but probably an actual monkey playing a guitar or some foolishness.

Having been born in 1976, The Monkees had stop recording years before. However, that didn’t stop the television show from making an immediate impact on me in the early 80’s (other shows in that category include The Banana Splits and The Baseball Bunch). Having little money buy the music, I would tape the songs off the television on a small recorder I had (take that you mp3 swapping fools!). I think Pleasant Valley Sunday was my favorite song for a long time, though A Little Bit Me, a Little Bit You and Randy Scouse Git favorites too.

Feeling a little nostalgic, I opened up the The Monkees Wikipedia page. When you are 5 or 6 years old watching a television show, it was the epitome of good-nature fun – just a bunch of wacky people getting into wacky adventures with catchy songs. However, 30 years later, I can appreciate what they accomplished in a different way.

Many people know that The Monkees were 4 comedic actors cast to capitalize on The Beatles craze in the mid to late sixties. Michael Nesmith and Peter Tork were the big musicians, but they weren’t making much. Davy Jones was a rising actor after a brief Broadway stint, and Mickey Dolenz was an actor who played a little guitar and did a little singing. That’s fine, because the plan was to dub them over music from another band.

Flash forward to today and the random cast people with the bare minimum of music experience became one of the best selling music groups of all time. This I find amazing. How did they do it?

On some level, there’s an appeal to a certain demographic. We saw at the time with Elvis and Beatles and it has progressed to New Kids on the Block, ‘N Sync, and Justin Beiber. A lesson here is never bet against the buying power of teenage girls when it comes to music.

However, I liked The Monkees… and I wasn’t in that demographic (there’s a comment section below for wise crack responses). There must have been something more appealing. It couldn’t have been music talent, because we know they didn’t have much of that. When the show started, they had no drummer. Davy Jones tested the best, but he couldn’t be seen over the drum set (and getting him seen was a priority for that Beiber demographic). Peter Tork and Michael Nesmith refused, leaving Mickey Dolenz with no drumming experience to be the drummer.

One thing that we learned from Malcolm Gladwell’s book Outliers, is that the 10,000 hours of practice goes a long way. He cited that the Beatles playing many long days in Hamburg. However, perhaps a better example of the 10,000 hour phenomenon was The Monkees. The Wikipedia article references this:

“The four actors would spend 12-hour days on the set, many of them waiting for the production crew to do their jobs. Noticing that their instruments were left on the set unplugged, the four decided to turn them on and start playing.”

It may sound very un-Lazy of me to say, but give credit to them. They put in the work, learned the skills and prospered. In addition to the musical talent, they had a knack for spotting catchy music. A few of their most popular songs were written by Neil Diamond. I was close to saying that The Monkees got lucky that they had such a talented musician writing for them, but according to a well-cited Wikipedia article, “There is a popular misconception that Diamond wrote and composed these songs specifically for the made-for-TV quartet. In reality, Diamond had written and recorded these songs for himself, but the cover versions were released before his own.” How The Monkees were able to pull this off is something that I’d be very interested to know.

Malcolm Gladwell in Outliers pointed out one additional thing that works with the 10,000 hours of preparation. It’s good old opportunity. In Outliers, it was Bill Gates and Bill Joy who had extensive access to computers when they weren’t readily available to the general public. The Monkees had their share in that getting cast for the television show in the first place.

As the Profiles of Success expands, I think we’ll find this is a recurring theme. If you have an idea for future segment in the series, leave a comment, or send me an email.

I don’t read many books. In fact, I only read books when I’m on vacation. They are great for plane rides and relaxing by the beach. During the rest of the year, I prefer to read blogs and other information from the Internet. That is starting to change and it’s all due to one man, Malcolm Gladwell. I probably wouldn’t have read any of his books if I didn’t run out of reading material on my vacation to Thailand. I wandered into a used bookstore store and found his first book The Tipping Point on sale for $5. My wife commented that she has never seen me as excited about reading a book.

The world works in mysterious ways. A couple of weeks after I returned from my trip I received an e-mail from the publisher of his most recent book. They offered to send me a free copy. Suckers! They just lost a sale. So I need to convince two readers to buy Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers, so that they come ahead. Don’t worry, I’m not keeping track.

What is Outliers about? It’s a study of success. What does it take to be successful? How do you get to be the best of the best? Let’s look at it chapter by chapter.

The Matthew Effect

Malcolm Gladwell doesn’t usually give chapters the most logical names. In this case it’s named after a passage, Matthew 25:29… something that I read roughly 12 times and can’t figure out what it means. Fortunately, it doesn’t matter to understand what Gladwell is trying to say. After reading enough of his books you realize his writing is usually the form of a story or study and a lesson that can be extrapoloated from that.

The first chapter focuses around the seemingly statistical anomaly that the best young Canadian hockey players are almost all born in January. You almost never find a top hockey player born in the last quarter of the year. The explanation turns out to be that that the age cut-off is December 31st. Someone born in January is going to have 10 months of development/practice more than someone born in October. The better players get extra coaching as they are seen as having the best chance at being a star someday. This has a snowball effect. The best players get grouped together in better leagues. The high-level of competition makes each player even better. Lesson: Timing can be critical to an outlier’s success.

My thoughts: Think about it as it may relate to an educational system. It’s pretty much the same way, right? I don’t remember if Gladwell went down that road, but my mind did while ready this.

The 10,000-Hour Rule

This chapter depicts the life stories of some very successful people and how they got that way. Gladwell explains that the Beatles played 10,000 hours in Hamburg, Germany (watch Backbeat for a good movie about the Beatles at this time). He also explains that Bill Joy (founder of Sun Microsystems) and Bill Gates had put in their 10,000 hours of computer work as well. The perception is that they were born with some kind of gift. It’s true that they were extremely talented, but most people ignore the fact that they had opportunity. Other bands may have been as talented as the Beatles, but they didn’t have the clubs Hamburg that made them play all day. Other people may have had the talent of Joy and Gates, but access to computers in their time was extremely limited. Gladwell looks at some of the richest people in history and finds that they often clustered around a certain event. There’s a cluster of richest people around the industrial revolution. There’s another cluster of computer entrepenuers around people born in the mid 1955’s. That put you on target to be age 20 when computers were just getting off the ground. Lesson: Outliers have the opportunity and put in the work to be the best of the best.

My thoughts: I’d rather not put in 10,000 of “work” to be the best. I have too many other things that I want to accomplish. Fortunately, I don’t consider blogging to be “work.” While I’m not quite at my 10,000 hours of blogging/writing, I’m probably upwords of 7,000. I’ll be testing Gladwell soon.

The Trouble with Geniuses, Part I

Gladwell spends this chapter showing that a high IQ is not a ticket for a free ride on the success train. He goes to show that once you reach a certain IQ, you are just as likely as to be successful as someone with a much higher IQ score. There are other factors that may come into play, such as creativity. Give two children a test of how many ways a brick could be used and you’ll find that even if they have the same IQ score, one may come up with a pile more uses than the other. Lesson: High intelligence as measured by IQ tests do not necessarily lead to success.

My thoughts: I guess I should stop carrying around my Mensa card from 2000. Perhaps this is why people exercise all parts of their brains. Note to self: pick up that guitar again.

The Trouble with Geniuses, Part II

In this chapter, Gladwell uses examples of two geniuses who grew up in vastly different environments. It’s very anecdotal, one gets the feeling that the two people are chosen specifically because they are polar opposites. One can still see the point that one raised in wealth and opportunity is more likely to be successful than one raised in poverty. The other point this chapter pushed was that social skills may be the difference in success between two people of high intelligence. Of course social skills are often related to the environment in which one is raised. Lesson: If you want to be successful, be born to a wealthy family and work on your social skills.

My thoughts: None of this hits me as unusual or shocking like many of Gladwell other observations. This is the start of where the book begins to go downhill a little for me. However at this point, I’ve already deemed a great book and anything else I’ve learned is gravy.

The Three Lessons of Joe Flom

Joe Flom was a lawyer in New York City whose success started in the mid 1950s. The three lessons are:

Have the right culture – Flom was Jewish and Gladwell makes a strong argument that it played a role in getting him in the right place at the right time.
Have demographic luck – Being a lawyer in New York City in the mid 1950s presented one with an opportunity that a lawyer might not have in Bozeman, Montana in 1910.
Have the right family history – Gladwell shows that entrepenuers like clothing makers often had children that were lawyers and doctors.

My thoughts: I think this is very much a summary of points that were made previously. The importance of family history was covered in the past chapter. The importance of demographic luck was covered in the 10,000 rule with Bill Gates and Bill Joy. As for having the right culture, I think that overlaps the family history in quite a few ways.

Harlan, Kentucky

Remember the Hatfield and McCoys? That’s the kind of culture that you have in Harlan, Kentucky. People have to fight to protect their land and income. If you don’t defend yourself, someone will think you are weak and steal it. Even though this isn’t the case today, the descendants of that kind of society still exhibit its traits. This is another example of how one is a product of demographics, culture, upbringing, etc. The only new thing this adds is that it persists for generations.

My thoughts: Overall this chapter was a little long to prove what seemed to be a simple point (unless I missed something). Gladwell doesn’t always concern himself with solutions to some of the problems brought up by his findings. However, it would be nice to feel that your potential success doesn’t rely on the environment of your great grandfather.

The Ethnic Theory of Plane Crashes

It’s the late 90’s and Korean Airlines is in trouble – there are statistically far too many crashes. The planes are not of poor quality. It’s the people and the process. It turns out that the Korean culture is that the person with higher authority should not be questioned. If a co-pilot sees a problem, he uses language that tends to point the pilot in the right direction, so that he can “think of it himself.” Where an American co-pilot might say, “We are dangerously low on fuel”, a Korean might have said something like, “This plane is flying light.” The submissive nature in the Korean culture didn’t allow for the balance check that co-pilot was supposed to provide. It would have been better if the co-pilot flew and the pilot directed him when he saw the need. Korean Airlines fixed the problem by changing the culture.

My thoughts: Overall I found this to be one of the strongest chapters in the book. I never new much about plane crashes. I thought they usually occured due to plane malfunction, but it seems to be human error most of the time. It was interesting to learn, once again, how culture can impact success – this way in a different way.

Rice Paddies and Math Tests

Is it a stereotype that Asians are good at math? Or is there something really behind it? It turns out that Asians are better at math. There are a couple of reasons for this. For one, many Asian languages have short, single-syllable numbers that are regular in format. English has irregularities like “thirteen” and “twenty” that must be learned as exceptions. The other is that taking care of rice paddies requires incredible discipline and attention to detail. These are qualities that may impact math skills in a positive way.

Marita’s Bargain

Like most of Malcolm Gladwell’s work, this chapter tells a story to illustrate some particular insight. The finding here is that students from low and middle class families regress in what they’ve learned during the summer break. Children of upper-class families seem to retain the knowledge from the previous year. The difference seems to be that the upper-class families encourage their children to learn more in the summertime. There’s piano classes and computer camp – things like that.

My thoughts: I’ve always heard that the brain is a muscle like any other. It need exercise. I’m not sure if brain tissue really counts as muscle (I’m not up on my anatomy), but I’m willing to overlook technical details. It is a very good insight and one that parents could pick up a lot from.

Epilogue

I didn’t find much, if any value in the epilogue. A lot of it was how the author himself is a product of many of these outlier conditions. It didn’t seem to bring anything new to the table. I would have much rather read a summary of all the discoveries in the book.

Final Thoughts

I think this is a very worthwhile book. It shows the value that timing and culture play in the development of all of us. It helps me understand that being in Silicon Valley may give me opportunities that being in Kansas doesn’t. If we have children, we’ll move to Canada and time them to be born in January so that they can be great hockey stars. (Wait that doesn’t seem, right…) We’ll think a little about school systems and try to have an older child so that he gets a better chance to be more developed and get into the better classes. We’ll teach the child Chinese and make him/her work in rice paddies to encourage the highest of math skills. (Hmmm, again, something seems out of place there…) We’ll encourage learning over the summer break. I have to admit that I don’t know the first thing about parenting, but it really has the wheels turning in my head.

Originally Published: Jan 13, 2009 at 04:55

Profiles of Success: Getting into some Monkee Business

Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell Reviewed