Over the years, I've written about the lottery many times. Usually when it reaches a new record, the media clings on to it and the hype just snowballs.
Despite all that I wrote the follow article the last time the lottery reached new highs: We Bought Lottery Tickets… Here’s Why.
So why am I writing about the lottery today? To the best of my knowledge it isn't near some kind of high. I don't follow them, but I haven't heard any particular hype.
This tells me it might be the best time to rationally discuss the lottery.
There's one other reason why I wanted to write about it today. Last night, I happened across this excellent Powerball Simulator on the LA Times.
I started out simulating the results of $1000, then putting another $5000, then $10,000, then $20,000, then $20,000, and finally $100,000. If you are going to test this prepare to go make lunch while it simulates the last $100,000.
So what happens when you put $156,000 in the lottery? I knew the odds of winning where incredible, but it was easy to think, "Hey, I'll just throw more virtual money at it until the simulator gets me the big win."
It seems reasonable enough, right? I can't change the odds of each individual play, so that's the only thing I can do.
So I spent $156,000 to win $15,083. I lost 140,917. So it appears to be set-up mathematically so that people will lose 90% of the money they put in.
Now, the money generally is "intended" to go to good use. I say "intended", because this ABC News article I dug up, appeared to called it into question.
As a final thought, you may have noticed that I put "debate" in quotes in the title. There's little mathematical debate about the lottery.
However, perhaps if people play with the simulator as I did, they'll feel differently about what they do with their real money. It's worth a shot, right?
2 Responses to “The End of the Lottery “Debate””
Next: How to Build Growing Income Streams with Dividend Growth Investing