<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MonaVie is Trying to Sue Me&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/</link>
	<description>Saving, Earning, and Investing Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:33:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-349558</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-349558</guid>
		<description>Excuse me sir, but this article is the absolute truth.  MonaVie did everything in it.  You can read about it in &lt;a href=&quot;http://consumerist.com/2009/09/monavie-hits-blogger-over-trademarks-in-metadata.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Consumerist&lt;/a&gt; including MonaVie&#039;s comment where they admit that they were wrong.

I&#039;m not and have never been involved with MonaVie.  Thus clearly it is quite possible to give MonaVie a bad rep. without &quot;sticking it out.&quot;  In this case MonaVie gave itself a bad rep. by having no clue about how the Internet works.

As for your claim of being a Gold Executive, it is worth noting that you happen to be about 700 in 700,000 distributors.  I got the 700 number by looking at &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.monavie.com/pdf/corporate/income_disclosure_statement.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MonaVie&#039;s Income Disclosure Statement&lt;/a&gt;  and used the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-is-embarrassed-by-their-income-disclosure-statement-2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;math that is explained here&lt;/a&gt; to come up with the 700,000 number.  As you can tell, you are the lucky 1 in 1000.  Your good fortune has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juicescam.com/its-not-a-matter-of-effort-its-a-mathematical-certainty/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mathematically hurt many, many others financially&lt;/a&gt;.  It is a like Bernie Madoff being proud of pyramid scheme.  The correct emotion here to have is shame.

As for all your claims:

- Remember that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juicescam.com/monavies-d-better-business-bureau-rating/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MonaVie recently had a D- Better Business Bureau Rating&lt;/a&gt;... and it also looks like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juicescam.com/did-monavie-pay-for-a-better-grade-from-the-better-business-bureau/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MonaVie Paid for Better Grade from the Better Business Bureau&lt;/a&gt;.  And if you read that second article, yes, you&#039;ll find out that the BBB is coming under fire - I reference an LA Times investigative story.  However, even Connecticut Attorney General said, &lt;b&gt;&quot;Right now, this rating system is really unworthy of consumer trust or confidence&lt;/b&gt;.  He has sent an official demand letter asking the BBB to discontinue the ratings system because it is &lt;b&gt;&quot;potentially harmful and misleading.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;  

- Inc. Magazine didn&#039;t include MonaVie in its 2010 rankings at all.  Why?  Well you have to understand &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-and-inc-magazines-500/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Inc. Magazine&#039;s odd methodology and what its rankings really mean&lt;/a&gt;.  Also, Inc. Magazine has published &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inc.com/magazine/19980601/941.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article against MLM scams like MonaVie&lt;/a&gt;... a full 7 years before MonaVie existed.  I recommend everyone read about Eliot there.  

- Lastly, there is no credible evidence that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juicescam.com/is-monavie-the-fastest-company-to-1-billion-dollars-in-revenue/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MonaVie did $1 billion in retail sales&lt;/a&gt;.  Considering it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-lies-about-the-orac-score-of-monavie/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lies about the ORAC score of its own juice&lt;/a&gt;, it would be hard to give any credibility to such statements.
 
However, of course a Gold level MonaVie distributor would know all the above.  That person would also know that they need to &lt;a href=&quot;http://monaviemediacenter.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;leave their name and distributor ID when posting on blogs&lt;/a&gt;, right?  Ladies and Gentleman, I give you Cory, yet another scammer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me sir, but this article is the absolute truth.  MonaVie did everything in it.  You can read about it in <a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/09/monavie-hits-blogger-over-trademarks-in-metadata.html" rel="nofollow">The Consumerist</a> including MonaVie&#8217;s comment where they admit that they were wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not and have never been involved with MonaVie.  Thus clearly it is quite possible to give MonaVie a bad rep. without &#8220;sticking it out.&#8221;  In this case MonaVie gave itself a bad rep. by having no clue about how the Internet works.</p>
<p>As for your claim of being a Gold Executive, it is worth noting that you happen to be about 700 in 700,000 distributors.  I got the 700 number by looking at <a href="http://media.monavie.com/pdf/corporate/income_disclosure_statement.pdf" rel="nofollow">MonaVie&#8217;s Income Disclosure Statement</a>  and used the <a href="http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-is-embarrassed-by-their-income-disclosure-statement-2/" rel="nofollow">math that is explained here</a> to come up with the 700,000 number.  As you can tell, you are the lucky 1 in 1000.  Your good fortune has <a href="http://www.juicescam.com/its-not-a-matter-of-effort-its-a-mathematical-certainty/" rel="nofollow">mathematically hurt many, many others financially</a>.  It is a like Bernie Madoff being proud of pyramid scheme.  The correct emotion here to have is shame.</p>
<p>As for all your claims:</p>
<p>- Remember that <a href="http://www.juicescam.com/monavies-d-better-business-bureau-rating/" rel="nofollow">MonaVie recently had a D- Better Business Bureau Rating</a>&#8230; and it also looks like <a href="http://www.juicescam.com/did-monavie-pay-for-a-better-grade-from-the-better-business-bureau/" rel="nofollow">MonaVie Paid for Better Grade from the Better Business Bureau</a>.  And if you read that second article, yes, you&#8217;ll find out that the BBB is coming under fire &#8211; I reference an LA Times investigative story.  However, even Connecticut Attorney General said, <b>&#8220;Right now, this rating system is really unworthy of consumer trust or confidence</b>.  He has sent an official demand letter asking the BBB to discontinue the ratings system because it is <b>&#8220;potentially harmful and misleading.&#8221;</b>  </p>
<p>- Inc. Magazine didn&#8217;t include MonaVie in its 2010 rankings at all.  Why?  Well you have to understand <a href="http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-and-inc-magazines-500/" rel="nofollow">Inc. Magazine&#8217;s odd methodology and what its rankings really mean</a>.  Also, Inc. Magazine has published <a href="http://www.inc.com/magazine/19980601/941.html" rel="nofollow">this article against MLM scams like MonaVie</a>&#8230; a full 7 years before MonaVie existed.  I recommend everyone read about Eliot there.  </p>
<p>- Lastly, there is no credible evidence that <a href="http://www.juicescam.com/is-monavie-the-fastest-company-to-1-billion-dollars-in-revenue/" rel="nofollow">MonaVie did $1 billion in retail sales</a>.  Considering it <a href="http://www.juicescam.com/monavie-lies-about-the-orac-score-of-monavie/" rel="nofollow">lies about the ORAC score of its own juice</a>, it would be hard to give any credibility to such statements.</p>
<p>However, of course a Gold level MonaVie distributor would know all the above.  That person would also know that they need to <a href="http://monaviemediacenter.com/" rel="nofollow">leave their name and distributor ID when posting on blogs</a>, right?  Ladies and Gentleman, I give you Cory, yet another scammer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-349554</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-349554</guid>
		<description>Excuse me sir but this article is absurd. MonaVie is a fantastic company. The people who give it a bad rep. are the people who don&#039;t stick it out. I was a construction worker from Minocqua, WI. at the age of 22 I saw the MonaVie/Team plan, my landlord showed me. I am now 24yrs. old, A monavie Gold Executive and am 100% Job Optional. Why???... Because I didn&#039;t listen to all you critics who said it was a scam. Look at MonaVie in the Better Business Bureau. They rate Monavie A+ and Team is rated A now tell me the Better Business Bureau is a SCAM. Also INC. MAG Sept 2009 issue rated monavie #1 functional food and beverage, #3 in Revenue, and #18 Overall. MonaVie went to $1billion in sales in 41 months why??? CAUSE IT WORKS!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me sir but this article is absurd. MonaVie is a fantastic company. The people who give it a bad rep. are the people who don&#8217;t stick it out. I was a construction worker from Minocqua, WI. at the age of 22 I saw the MonaVie/Team plan, my landlord showed me. I am now 24yrs. old, A monavie Gold Executive and am 100% Job Optional. Why???&#8230; Because I didn&#8217;t listen to all you critics who said it was a scam. Look at MonaVie in the Better Business Bureau. They rate Monavie A+ and Team is rated A now tell me the Better Business Bureau is a SCAM. Also INC. MAG Sept 2009 issue rated monavie #1 functional food and beverage, #3 in Revenue, and #18 Overall. MonaVie went to $1billion in sales in 41 months why??? CAUSE IT WORKS!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-346751</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-346751</guid>
		<description>Please read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juicescam.com/the-problem-with-the-try-monavie-argument/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Problem with the â€œTry MonaVieâ€ Argument&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please read <a href="http://www.juicescam.com/the-problem-with-the-try-monavie-argument/" rel="nofollow">The Problem with the â€œTry MonaVieâ€ Argument</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-346671</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-346671</guid>
		<description>Why do you knock a product before you have tried it?  People with negative attitudes have negative results regardless of they do.  Say what you must, but Monavie works wonders for me...   and I am already on my way to financial freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you knock a product before you have tried it?  People with negative attitudes have negative results regardless of they do.  Say what you must, but Monavie works wonders for me&#8230;   and I am already on my way to financial freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dap</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-229170</link>
		<dc:creator>dap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-229170</guid>
		<description>Heather Seamons is an idiot.  She never gives a direct answer to any good legal questions, i.e., why does Monavie allow all these people to sell monavie on e-bay (which a distributor is not allowed to do) and they use the Monavie name of course and sell the product cheaper than a distributor can purchase it.  She will never answer.  It is a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heather Seamons is an idiot.  She never gives a direct answer to any good legal questions, i.e., why does Monavie allow all these people to sell monavie on e-bay (which a distributor is not allowed to do) and they use the Monavie name of course and sell the product cheaper than a distributor can purchase it.  She will never answer.  It is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-197531</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 16:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-197531</guid>
		<description>I have worked for UPS since (before) MonaVie was around.. I have witnessed the novelty-based surge and its recent (drastic) decline.  We&#039;re almost rid of this incarnation of snake oil.  What&#039;s the next pyramid scheme to debunk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have worked for UPS since (before) MonaVie was around.. I have witnessed the novelty-based surge and its recent (drastic) decline.  We&#8217;re almost rid of this incarnation of snake oil.  What&#8217;s the next pyramid scheme to debunk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-166613</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-166613</guid>
		<description>Can we agree that you can believe &lt;a href=&quot;http://consumerist.com/2009/09/monavie-hits-blogger-over-trademarks-in-metadata.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Consumer Reports&#039; website, the Consumerist&lt;/a&gt;.  That outlines the situation with MonaVie&#039;s offical side of the story.

I don&#039;t delete any posts that disagree with me.  Did you read comment #44 here, where a MonaVie employee called me an &quot;annoying douche&quot;?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-employee-calls-me-an-annoying-douche/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;You can read more information about that here&lt;/a&gt;.

And if you don&#039;t believe me about all that, why not check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://monaviemediacenter.com/blogs/5-tips-every-monavie-distributor-needs-to-know-about-the-new-ftc-guidelines/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comments of MonaVie&#039;s official blog where they admit to it.&lt;/a&gt;

Why not check with MonaVie themselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we agree that you can believe <a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/09/monavie-hits-blogger-over-trademarks-in-metadata.html" rel="nofollow">Consumer Reports&#8217; website, the Consumerist</a>.  That outlines the situation with MonaVie&#8217;s offical side of the story.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t delete any posts that disagree with me.  Did you read comment #44 here, where a MonaVie employee called me an &#8220;annoying douche&#8221;?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-employee-calls-me-an-annoying-douche/" rel="nofollow">You can read more information about that here</a>.</p>
<p>And if you don&#8217;t believe me about all that, why not check out the <a href="http://monaviemediacenter.com/blogs/5-tips-every-monavie-distributor-needs-to-know-about-the-new-ftc-guidelines/" rel="nofollow">comments of MonaVie&#8217;s official blog where they admit to it.</a></p>
<p>Why not check with MonaVie themselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Working Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-166610</link>
		<dc:creator>Working Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-166610</guid>
		<description>So since you said they sent the email we are suppose to believe you, I mean you are Anti Monavie. Why do you delete peoples post that disagree with you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So since you said they sent the email we are suppose to believe you, I mean you are Anti Monavie. Why do you delete peoples post that disagree with you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-163981</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-163981</guid>
		<description>Yeah, you are probably going to lose that fight.  There&#039;s a difference between owning a domain that has trademarked terms in it and using it in the path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you are probably going to lose that fight.  There&#8217;s a difference between owning a domain that has trademarked terms in it and using it in the path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shemtov</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-163933</link>
		<dc:creator>Shemtov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-163933</guid>
		<description>Hello,
It seems like we&#039;re in the same boat.
I own monavie.mobi and I just received the second &quot;Cease and Desist&quot; Email from them.
Do you think I should give this domain to them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
It seems like we&#8217;re in the same boat.<br />
I own monavie.mobi and I just received the second &#8220;Cease and Desist&#8221; Email from them.<br />
Do you think I should give this domain to them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-153793</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-153793</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t received any more communication from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t received any more communication from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-153625</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-153625</guid>
		<description>Lazy Man, did they send any more letters or did they drop it?  I&#039;m curious to see what they did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lazy Man, did they send any more letters or did they drop it?  I&#8217;m curious to see what they did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-152175</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-152175</guid>
		<description>Emily-Nicole,

At first I didn&#039;t understand why it implied my wife was a distributor, because I was using a version of recruit as in &quot;to attempt to acquire the services of a person&quot;, but I can see that it can also be the actual joining.

Learn something new I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emily-Nicole,</p>
<p>At first I didn&#8217;t understand why it implied my wife was a distributor, because I was using a version of recruit as in &#8220;to attempt to acquire the services of a person&#8221;, but I can see that it can also be the actual joining.</p>
<p>Learn something new I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily-Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-152163</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily-Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-152163</guid>
		<description>I think they could&#039;ve thought you were a distributor because of the post name which states &quot;was my wife recruited to a scam&quot; or something like that... so it implies that, at least, your wife is a distributor. Gotta love getting sued over freedom of speech. It happened to me a few years back. Funny thing, they just moved the content to chillingeffects so people can still find it. haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they could&#8217;ve thought you were a distributor because of the post name which states &#8220;was my wife recruited to a scam&#8221; or something like that&#8230; so it implies that, at least, your wife is a distributor. Gotta love getting sued over freedom of speech. It happened to me a few years back. Funny thing, they just moved the content to chillingeffects so people can still find it. haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motown Expat</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-150773</link>
		<dc:creator>Motown Expat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-150773</guid>
		<description>MonaVie&#039;s approach is interesting, to say the least.

A local MonaVie distributor recently posted a comment to a LinkedIn group I belong to.  Does that mean he violated his distributor agreement?

The distributor&#039;s comment received a response from another group member, questioning the product&#039;s claimed benefits.  I then posted, asking the responder to cite references for her statements.  The distributor immediately heaped praise on me, assuming I was siding with him.  When I clarified I was merely asking for support for the statements made, the distributor began attacking me.  Clearly, such tactics are business as usual for MonaVie and its distributors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MonaVie&#8217;s approach is interesting, to say the least.</p>
<p>A local MonaVie distributor recently posted a comment to a LinkedIn group I belong to.  Does that mean he violated his distributor agreement?</p>
<p>The distributor&#8217;s comment received a response from another group member, questioning the product&#8217;s claimed benefits.  I then posted, asking the responder to cite references for her statements.  The distributor immediately heaped praise on me, assuming I was siding with him.  When I clarified I was merely asking for support for the statements made, the distributor began attacking me.  Clearly, such tactics are business as usual for MonaVie and its distributors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-150635</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-150635</guid>
		<description>So what&#039;s next?  Are they going to file a lawsuit over this?  Any more threatening letters?  This is crazy.  So if I&#039;m critiquing the iphone, and the title of my blog post says &quot;iPhone has terrible battery life,&quot; and the word &quot;iphone&quot; is part of the link...they can sue me???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s next?  Are they going to file a lawsuit over this?  Any more threatening letters?  This is crazy.  So if I&#8217;m critiquing the iphone, and the title of my blog post says &#8220;iPhone has terrible battery life,&#8221; and the word &#8220;iphone&#8221; is part of the link&#8230;they can sue me???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-149538</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-149538</guid>
		<description>Alexander,

How do you know that MonaVie has helped you.  I used to get colds and flu a few years ago (a few a year), but I haven&#039;t gotten any in the last three or so.  I didn&#039;t drink MonaVie, so maybe it&#039;s just coincidence.

I think an apple will give you a lower appetite as well, since it has more calories, more fiber, and is cheaper... so it&#039;s still a poor financial choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexander,</p>
<p>How do you know that MonaVie has helped you.  I used to get colds and flu a few years ago (a few a year), but I haven&#8217;t gotten any in the last three or so.  I didn&#8217;t drink MonaVie, so maybe it&#8217;s just coincidence.</p>
<p>I think an apple will give you a lower appetite as well, since it has more calories, more fiber, and is cheaper&#8230; so it&#8217;s still a poor financial choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-149510</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-149510</guid>
		<description>As a monavie drinker (not distributor) I look for negative information like this to see if I have been fooled. Since I buy on ebay and I do not have to be part of a stupid MLM racket, I can only assume they do think you are a distributor. Monavie has helped me (no colds or flu) and a lower appetite justifies some of the cost, but I do have a nagging doubt.
Keep up the fight to defend your right to speak out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a monavie drinker (not distributor) I look for negative information like this to see if I have been fooled. Since I buy on ebay and I do not have to be part of a stupid MLM racket, I can only assume they do think you are a distributor. Monavie has helped me (no colds or flu) and a lower appetite justifies some of the cost, but I do have a nagging doubt.<br />
Keep up the fight to defend your right to speak out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warded</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-149322</link>
		<dc:creator>warded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-149322</guid>
		<description>hey lazy man, I know nothing about mona vie, but do have a phd in cellular and molecular neuroscience as well as years of post-doctoral work in pharmacology in the area of prostaglandins and inflammation. Any time a herbal/nutritional supplement co claims &quot;research&quot; they are basically manipulating the system, and not using science. where are there placebo-controlled, double blind studie guidlines, where are the data and who approved the design and interpretation of the data and studies? as far as the lawsuit thing goes, it you loose on the url thing, and want to continue to be sure people know what you are directing your blog at, then maybe include something like &quot;phonetic-moan-of-e&quot; (or ee or eee-just enough to say your different and that monavie does not have the right to the sound of their trademark-something like that or along those lines). big Co. bullying is bullshit!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey lazy man, I know nothing about mona vie, but do have a phd in cellular and molecular neuroscience as well as years of post-doctoral work in pharmacology in the area of prostaglandins and inflammation. Any time a herbal/nutritional supplement co claims &#8220;research&#8221; they are basically manipulating the system, and not using science. where are there placebo-controlled, double blind studie guidlines, where are the data and who approved the design and interpretation of the data and studies? as far as the lawsuit thing goes, it you loose on the url thing, and want to continue to be sure people know what you are directing your blog at, then maybe include something like &#8220;phonetic-moan-of-e&#8221; (or ee or eee-just enough to say your different and that monavie does not have the right to the sound of their trademark-something like that or along those lines). big Co. bullying is bullshit!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/monavie-sue-me/comment-page-1/#comment-148693</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2253#comment-148693</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve spoken with multiple lawyers and they think I&#039;m in the clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve spoken with multiple lawyers and they think I&#8217;m in the clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 494/513 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.lazymanandmoney.com @ 2012-02-10 18:34:41 -->
