<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emptying the Recycle Bin of My Mind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/</link>
	<description>Saving, Earning, and Investing Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:22:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/comment-page-1/#comment-138847</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2030#comment-138847</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if I&#039;m that concerned about them getting it right by a year or two.  I&#039;m sure the projection won&#039;t be entirely accurate.  Yet, I&#039;d like to see a plan in place that secures assets won&#039;t be depleted for those paying into the system now... and it should project for a lot longer than that.

The article was quick to mention that SS wouldn&#039;t stop... just that the current assets would be depleted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;m that concerned about them getting it right by a year or two.  I&#8217;m sure the projection won&#8217;t be entirely accurate.  Yet, I&#8217;d like to see a plan in place that secures assets won&#8217;t be depleted for those paying into the system now&#8230; and it should project for a lot longer than that.</p>
<p>The article was quick to mention that SS wouldn&#8217;t stop&#8230; just that the current assets would be depleted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/comment-page-1/#comment-138833</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2030#comment-138833</guid>
		<description>Lazy, yes the SS funds have been moving in the wrong direction.   But keep in mind this is a projection about what will happen 3 decades from now.  A decade ago they were guessing a number that they&#039;ve since decided was a decade off.  Its got a big margin of error.   If their guess 10 years ago was 10 years wrong then what confidence should we put in their guess today?
This number is also based on moderate assumptions about the economy.  If the economy performs a little better then we&#039;ll never run out of money.

If/when SS trust does run out of money that doesn&#039;t mean SS benefits will stop.  They&#039;ll just not be able to fully fund the obligations without taking out debt (they aren&#039;t shy about doing that) , reducing benefits or raising taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lazy, yes the SS funds have been moving in the wrong direction.   But keep in mind this is a projection about what will happen 3 decades from now.  A decade ago they were guessing a number that they&#8217;ve since decided was a decade off.  Its got a big margin of error.   If their guess 10 years ago was 10 years wrong then what confidence should we put in their guess today?<br />
This number is also based on moderate assumptions about the economy.  If the economy performs a little better then we&#8217;ll never run out of money.</p>
<p>If/when SS trust does run out of money that doesn&#8217;t mean SS benefits will stop.  They&#8217;ll just not be able to fully fund the obligations without taking out debt (they aren&#8217;t shy about doing that) , reducing benefits or raising taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/comment-page-1/#comment-138801</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2030#comment-138801</guid>
		<description>&quot;Still, I would think that 33 bottles a day is a little excessive.&quot;

True. But when I first read it, I was thinking, &quot;How is that even possible to drink 160 botles in one day, everyday?&quot;
33 bottles is a lot of water, but at least it seems possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Still, I would think that 33 bottles a day is a little excessive.&#8221;</p>
<p>True. But when I first read it, I was thinking, &#8220;How is that even possible to drink 160 botles in one day, everyday?&#8221;<br />
33 bottles is a lot of water, but at least it seems possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kosmo @ The Casual Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/comment-page-1/#comment-138671</link>
		<dc:creator>Kosmo @ The Casual Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2030#comment-138671</guid>
		<description>Traciatim - you&#039;re right about Wednesdays.  With my work schedule, I get 1 day off every two weeks.  It&#039;s Mondays now, mostly because with a family, Monday (or Friday) make the most sense.  When I was single, I took Wednesdays off for a while.  Having 2 mini weeks was nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traciatim &#8211; you&#8217;re right about Wednesdays.  With my work schedule, I get 1 day off every two weeks.  It&#8217;s Mondays now, mostly because with a family, Monday (or Friday) make the most sense.  When I was single, I took Wednesdays off for a while.  Having 2 mini weeks was nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traciatim</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/comment-page-1/#comment-138514</link>
		<dc:creator>Traciatim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2030#comment-138514</guid>
		<description>&quot;I can&#039;t decide what is better, having Monday off or the quick week that follows it&quot;

You know what&#039;s even better... taking Wednesdays off. No one really expects it, but it&#039;s pretty similar to taking the whole week off. Monday you come in and just ramp up catching up from the weekend. Tuesday you are ramping down already making sure work gets taken care of on Wednesday, then you&#039;re off. Thursday-Friday is just like Monday-Tuesday. There are never any peak days all week long, it&#039;s fantastic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can&#8217;t decide what is better, having Monday off or the quick week that follows it&#8221;</p>
<p>You know what&#8217;s even better&#8230; taking Wednesdays off. No one really expects it, but it&#8217;s pretty similar to taking the whole week off. Monday you come in and just ramp up catching up from the weekend. Tuesday you are ramping down already making sure work gets taken care of on Wednesday, then you&#8217;re off. Thursday-Friday is just like Monday-Tuesday. There are never any peak days all week long, it&#8217;s fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/comment-page-1/#comment-138468</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2030#comment-138468</guid>
		<description>Yep my math was faulty.  My original number saying that it was 330+ bottles was off.  That lead to the poor math of the 160 bottle number.

Still, I would think that 33 bottles a day is a little excessive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep my math was faulty.  My original number saying that it was 330+ bottles was off.  That lead to the poor math of the 160 bottle number.</p>
<p>Still, I would think that 33 bottles a day is a little excessive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/comment-page-1/#comment-138463</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2030#comment-138463</guid>
		<description>Having a hard time following your math on Madonna&#039;s daily water usage. 

Am I missing something.

At $10 bottle (after shipping), isn&#039;t that 1000 bottles/month or 1000/30 = 33 bottles per day?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a hard time following your math on Madonna&#8217;s daily water usage. </p>
<p>Am I missing something.</p>
<p>At $10 bottle (after shipping), isn&#8217;t that 1000 bottles/month or 1000/30 = 33 bottles per day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kosmo @ The Casual Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/comment-page-1/#comment-138438</link>
		<dc:creator>Kosmo @ The Casual Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2030#comment-138438</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t worry too much about the title of the Social Security article.  It&#039;s a moronic and shortsighted article.

I wish I could find it again, but there is a place on the SS web site that has tables to show you projected rate of return based on age, earning, and marital status.  For my situation, I think it was something like 2.3% (note: this is the return on the combination of the employee and employer shares).

If I stumble across the table, I&#039;ll post a link.  I&#039;m just not able to figure out the magic Google combination today.

Over the long term, my 401(k) is going to blow that away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t worry too much about the title of the Social Security article.  It&#8217;s a moronic and shortsighted article.</p>
<p>I wish I could find it again, but there is a place on the SS web site that has tables to show you projected rate of return based on age, earning, and marital status.  For my situation, I think it was something like 2.3% (note: this is the return on the combination of the employee and employer shares).</p>
<p>If I stumble across the table, I&#8217;ll post a link.  I&#8217;m just not able to figure out the magic Google combination today.</p>
<p>Over the long term, my 401(k) is going to blow that away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/comment-page-1/#comment-138437</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2030#comment-138437</guid>
		<description>Except for the fact that (according to the article) last year assets were expected to be exhausted in 2041... this would mean things are moving in the wrong direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except for the fact that (according to the article) last year assets were expected to be exhausted in 2041&#8230; this would mean things are moving in the wrong direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/emptying-the-recycle-bin-of-my-mind-2/comment-page-1/#comment-138436</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazymanandmoney.com/?p=2030#comment-138436</guid>
		<description>&quot;that assets will be exhausted when I turn 61 (2037).&quot;

In 1997 they expected the trust funds to run out in 2029.  Now 12 years later we&#039;ve got until 2037.  If that trend continues in 2037 they&#039;ll be saying it will run out in 2057.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;that assets will be exhausted when I turn 61 (2037).&#8221;</p>
<p>In 1997 they expected the trust funds to run out in 2029.  Now 12 years later we&#8217;ve got until 2037.  If that trend continues in 2037 they&#8217;ll be saying it will run out in 2057.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
